Gamers and game designers admire video games where the game’s mechanics (what the game allows you to do and how you can do it) and its “content” (the problems you solve in the game) are well matched.   For example, many games have a jump mechanic—the player can make an avatar jump.  That is a game mechanic.  The jump mechanic can be combined with other mechanics in different ways to solve different sorts of problems, such as moving quickly across posts of different heights fast sinking in a rising body of water (yes, I’ve done it).

When game mechanics work well to solve problems and solving them takes some practice, strategy, and thought, we get a good match between form (game mechanics) and function (play = problem solving).  The popular game series Angry Birds uses a simple sling-shot mechanic to allow players to solve interesting physics problems involving force, motion, trajectories, and vectors.  It is a thing of beauty when a simple game mechanic or set of them leads players to be able to solve complex problems.  It gives rise to a feeling like a driver can get when stepping on a gas pedal in a car: such power comes from such a simple mechanic!

Plants vs. Zombies is another game that has a perfect and simple match between game mechanics and problem solving.  The player can pick from a number of different plants and place them in the front yard of a house.  Depending on the plant and its placement, and the other plants around it, the plants protect the player’s house from a swarm of zombies coming in row after row.  Things speed up over time and the player has to make quick decisions, keep the plants coming, and quickly replace ones that have been killed.

Plants vs. Zombies strips a game down to (almost) its bare basics.  It is a real-time strategy game in which the simple acts of choosing and placing plants with different powers ramps up to complicated strategic thinking requiring quick decisions.  Each level becomes harder and harder and the player needs to learn and perfect different strategies across different levels of the game.

When I said Plants vs. Zombies strips a game down to its basics—game mechanics married perfectly to a certain sort of problem solving—this is not completely true.  Why plants and zombies?  The designer could have chosen other things than plants and zombies.  The form-function match would work as well.  Indeed, the designer could simply have used different shapes (as in Tetris), say triangles against squares, each with different powers.  The designer chose an anime (cartoon) style of graphics, eschewing realism altogether.  Why?  And there is music—why is this needed?  All these things are “extras” that do not fit in any straightforward way with the form (game mechanics) – function (problem solving) match that is the heart and soul of a video game.

Almost all games have such extras (Tetris is perhaps the nearest thing to a game that is purely a perfect form-function match).  One of the common extras in many, but not all, video games is a story.  Since a game is a set of problems to solve it is does not demand a story and some games have none.  Furthermore, when the story has little to do with the problems being solved and how the player uses the game’s mechanics to solve them, it can become an irritating distraction, especially if the player has to watch long cut-scenes that interrupt play to experience the story.

So why have extras?  Why have stories, in particular, since they can be long, complicated, and take time to tell that may remove the player’s attention from play?  There are several different answers to this question, but, to my mind, the most important one is this:  These extras are there to answer several crucial questions for the player.  These questions are:

  1. What am I doing?
  2. Why am I doing it?
  3. Why should I care about it?
  4. How should I feel about it?
  5. How should I value it?
  6. Who am I supposed to be when I am doing it?

These questions are important for any activity that humans carry out.  They create a condition I call “lucidity.”  Humans do not perform well or learn well when things are not lucid for them.  They are, after all, creatures tropic to meaning.  So answers to these questions are crucial in classrooms, though too often go unanswered there.  Students learning algebra, for instance, need to know the answers to these questions if optimum learning is to occur.  That’s just the way humans are: they are not very good at learning things that do not matter to them or which they do not “get” in a meaningful, valueladen, personal way.

The “extras” in Plants vs. Zombies tell the player that this is game, a rather whimsical one; that it is in the anime category, not realism; that it is not a triple AAA blockbuster game, but an independent, small-scale game; that it fits with the “save the world” theme in many games, but also with the current craze for all things zombie; and that solving problems of complex thinking is not always best done as work but often as play.  All this tells players in the know what sort of gamer identity they are supposed to bring to this game (not their Halo hat, but not edutainment either).  It tells them, too, what sort of cultural milieu they are meant to swim in here.  Note that there is a minimal story here (zombies), but that is enough to get the job done.  Of course, since is a game, they can choose to play or not once they have gotten the answers to the requisite questions.

In school, students often have no choice about what to study, so how the above questions are answered is all the more crucial.  There better be wiggle room for different sorts of students to customize the answers to their own interests and desires.  Furthermore, in school, the last question is the most crucial.  When young students are confronted with a subject like physics in school, they need to know: Who does this? What is it really? Why do they do it? Why does it matter and how?  What will I do with it?  Who am I supposed to be when I do it (which amounts to knowing how one is supposed to think; act; dress; interact with people, things, and tools; speak, listen, write, read; feel; and value while doing it).

The issue of extras and lucidity arises in an interesting way in architecture.  Just as with a game or a classroom, people who function in a designed space need to get answers to the above questions.  The extras that go beyond mere form-function matching need to answer these questions and, here, too, there needs to be wiggle room.  I suspect, also, that the identity question is equally important here as in school.  And it may (as in school) be about identity at several different levels—individual, social, historic, communal, and civic—at one and the same time.

I write this in an old farm house on a small farm I have just moved into.  I have never been a farmer and am not one yet—soon I hope—but the farm house, the pasture, the neighboring houses and fields, all yell out the answers to the above questions loud and clear.  It is lucid and I feel the call to a new identity.  Already the “extras” have taught me an important lesson.  The gopher holes all over—in this context—speak (as do so many other things here) about choices between life and death that come not with dominating the earth but husbanding it.  Yesterday I did something that I thought I would never ever do in my life.  I bought a trap.


1 2 3
March 29th, 2018

The Interpreter System (7)

Let’s return to our diagram of a human being (or, “an enviro-human system”).  I want now to look just at […]

March 27th, 2018

Joint Actor Systems (6)

The diagram I used in the last post is misleading in that it makes things look more contained and bounded […]

March 26th, 2018

A Human Being (5)

Last time, we raised the question: “What is ‘Jim”?” (substitute your own name for “Jim” here).  We think of ourselves […]

March 25th, 2018

Jim and Identities/Discourses (4)

When we make a choice, who is making the choice?  We have already seen that there are lots of things […]

March 10th, 2018

Alternates (3)

When we make a choice about ourselves often that choice is vastly undetermined by the information we have available.  Say […]

March 7th, 2018

Flourishing (2)

It makes little sense to see a human being (or any other animal) as an individual making free choices.  In […]

February 25th, 2018

Free Will (1)

Note that the question of free will simply does not arise for animals.  We think that, even for intelligent species, […]

October 29th, 2017

The Principle of Charity

October 8th, 2017

Character Education

Recently, the College of Education at Arizona State University—where I work— received funding from the Kern Family Foundation to make […]

June 15th, 2017

Neoliberalism Part 6 (The End)

What killed people’s sense of mattering was the growth of very high levels of inequality.  What caused such high levels […]

June 14th, 2017

Neoliberalism Part 5

Many of us tend to think of history as a march forward and upward. So, we tend to interpret the […]

June 14th, 2017

Neoliberalism Part 4

The Catholic Church declined in three stages. The same was true for many other institutions.  “The Sixties” (roughly from 1963 […]

June 12th, 2017

Neoliberalism Part 3

Today, we have among the highest levels of inequality we have ever had.  Drug addiction, environmental degradation, flows of climate […]

June 11th, 2017

Neoliberalism Part 2

The British economist John Maynard Keynes and “Keynesian Economics” were foundational to the Bretton Woods Agreement and to the world […]

June 10th, 2017

Neoliberalism Part 1

Though neo-liberalism is the “usual suspect” for the miseries of our institutions and society, it is not nearly as relevant […]

May 30th, 2017

Main Points from My New Book

Teaching, Learning, Literary in our High-Risk, High-Tech World: A Framework for Becoming Human (Teachers College Press, 2017). Ignorance We humans […]

April 17th, 2017

The Importance of Discourse Analysis:
Step 10 The End

Neither love nor liking is necessary for the sorts of critical discussions among different frameworks that might lead to shared […]

April 15th, 2016

The Importance of Discourse Analysis:
Step 9 Interpretation

Goodwill.  What could possibly encourage people in a fractured and inequitable world to have goodwill?  I, for one, do not […]

April 14th, 2016

The Importance of Discourse Analysis:
Step 8 An Example

I want now to give an example of two different frameworks that certainly appear incommensurable.  My purpose here is make […]

April 12th, 2016

The Importance of Discourse Analysis:
Step 7 Discussion

We are at a critical juncture now in our attempt to understand why frameworks can cause us humans such grief.  […]