Consider an internet site devoted to designing for the video game, The Sims (the bestselling set of video games in history).  In the Sims players can use 3-D design tools to design houses, environments, furniture, clothes, and many other things to resource the families and neighborhoods they are building in the game.  They can also give away or sell what they design to other players so they, too, can use them in their game play.  All this fan-based design work is the great game-designer Will Wright’s “sneaky” way to get players to do his work for him, all the while resourcing their creativity and taking his money to the bank.  So far no one is complaining.

This Sims site is what I call a passionate affinity space.  People with a passion for designing for the Sims set up a hive of activities, interactions, and teaching and learning tools to resource people with an interest in the Sims and, for some of them, to fan that interest into a passion and a real mastery of design.

The site is a space within bigger spaces and it is space linked or connected to other spaces, some “far away” from it.  All these sets of inter-connected spaces are an affinity space, one big one, and each space is part of the larger affinity space and itself an affinity space.  Every space (even a book or guide that is linked within the whole system and used as part of it) is a “portal” to information about and activities in regard to the Sims.  Some of the portals are also “generators” in the that in these spaces fans can not only get information, but can produce (generate) information, social interactions, and activities themselves.

Even within the one site we are considering, people do more than just design things for themselves and others to use in their play.  They engage in a myriad of other endeavors, as well.  Some create novel challenges about how to play the game and run competitions.  Some use the design tools that come with the game—and other tools like Adobe Photoshop—to create graphic novels, a form of fan-fiction devoted to the Sims.  Some debate the design of the game and suggest modifications; some debate how well the game represents different aspects of culturally and class-based lives in the “real” world.  Others organize social activities on the site or in the real world.  Still others take their Sims design skills over into landscaping, designing furniture or clothes, or taking photography in the “real” world or in other virtual spaces (like Second Life).  And many passionate fans design teaching tools and offer mentorship to help others learn and, if they want, become passionate masters themselves.  Some people on the site become real masters of design with no “official” credentials or degrees—gaining wide respect and adulation (and sometimes money)—a phenomenon happening across many Maker Spaces.

No one, I think, really yet knows how to map the geography and explicate the physics of affinity spaces (within spaces).  The word “space” here is a metaphor, but, perhaps, it is more.  Or, then, again, maybe we should invent a whole new word here.  I don’t know.

However, there are those who are impressed by the way in which affinity spaces organize teaching, learning, mastery, creativity, and the acquisition of 21st Century skills (for example, in our current example, 3D design, computational thinking, leadership, collaboration, collective design and intelligence, fanning interests into passions, and various transfers to the “real” world).  They ask whether we can “make” an affinity space in bricks and mortar and grass.  But then the metaphor can come back to “eat” its own literal tail (base).  Others are interested other sorts of bricks, and mortar and grass of things inspired by other sorts of virtual spaces devoted to areas like medicine and health, activism and community development, “third spaces”, and even, I would think, religion.

When architects design real rooms and buildings they often take advantage of the “golden ration”.  This ratio – 1:1.61– is found in nature repeatedly, for example, in the shapes of clouds and flowers, in the proportions of bodies, human ones included, and in aspects of the universe as a whole.  It is fundamental to mathematics, music, and painting.  And it is a fundamental part of the architect’s toolkit.

An architect might determine that the best shape of a room designed for certain specific sorts of interactions is a golden ratio rectangle, not a square or a circle.  This decision will be based on how people feel, think, and interact in such spaces, on how such space shape the human mind, body, and social interactions.

But what is the shape of affinity spaces and the “rooms” in them?  How do these shapes shape the human mind, body, and social interactions when the body has entered virtual space or a combination of virtual and “real” spaces?  Are there any “golden ratios” here?  What happens to “real” buildings and “real” space when virtual space comes to re-shape it?  What then will then rebound back to virtual space to transform it and its fit with the “real”?  These are, I would think, new questions, as of yet unconnected to any one discipline.  As with all good new questions, here the metaphorical and the “real” blend, mix, and transform each other.



1 2 3
March 29th, 2018

The Interpreter System (7)

Let’s return to our diagram of a human being (or, “an enviro-human system”).  I want now to look just at […]

March 27th, 2018

Joint Actor Systems (6)

The diagram I used in the last post is misleading in that it makes things look more contained and bounded […]

March 26th, 2018

A Human Being (5)

Last time, we raised the question: “What is ‘Jim”?” (substitute your own name for “Jim” here).  We think of ourselves […]

March 25th, 2018

Jim and Identities/Discourses (4)

When we make a choice, who is making the choice?  We have already seen that there are lots of things […]

March 10th, 2018

Alternates (3)

When we make a choice about ourselves often that choice is vastly undetermined by the information we have available.  Say […]

March 7th, 2018

Flourishing (2)

It makes little sense to see a human being (or any other animal) as an individual making free choices.  In […]

February 25th, 2018

Free Will (1)

Note that the question of free will simply does not arise for animals.  We think that, even for intelligent species, […]

October 29th, 2017

The Principle of Charity

October 8th, 2017

Character Education

Recently, the College of Education at Arizona State University—where I work— received funding from the Kern Family Foundation to make […]

June 15th, 2017

Neoliberalism Part 6 (The End)

What killed people’s sense of mattering was the growth of very high levels of inequality.  What caused such high levels […]

June 14th, 2017

Neoliberalism Part 5

Many of us tend to think of history as a march forward and upward. So, we tend to interpret the […]

June 14th, 2017

Neoliberalism Part 4

The Catholic Church declined in three stages. The same was true for many other institutions.  “The Sixties” (roughly from 1963 […]

June 12th, 2017

Neoliberalism Part 3

Today, we have among the highest levels of inequality we have ever had.  Drug addiction, environmental degradation, flows of climate […]

June 11th, 2017

Neoliberalism Part 2

The British economist John Maynard Keynes and “Keynesian Economics” were foundational to the Bretton Woods Agreement and to the world […]

June 10th, 2017

Neoliberalism Part 1

Though neo-liberalism is the “usual suspect” for the miseries of our institutions and society, it is not nearly as relevant […]

May 30th, 2017

Main Points from My New Book

Teaching, Learning, Literary in our High-Risk, High-Tech World: A Framework for Becoming Human (Teachers College Press, 2017). Ignorance We humans […]

April 17th, 2017

The Importance of Discourse Analysis:
Step 10 The End

Neither love nor liking is necessary for the sorts of critical discussions among different frameworks that might lead to shared […]

April 15th, 2016

The Importance of Discourse Analysis:
Step 9 Interpretation

Goodwill.  What could possibly encourage people in a fractured and inequitable world to have goodwill?  I, for one, do not […]

April 14th, 2016

The Importance of Discourse Analysis:
Step 8 An Example

I want now to give an example of two different frameworks that certainly appear incommensurable.  My purpose here is make […]

April 12th, 2016

The Importance of Discourse Analysis:
Step 7 Discussion

We are at a critical juncture now in our attempt to understand why frameworks can cause us humans such grief.  […]